MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2419144360 · doi:10.1109/wts.2016.7482052

Resource management in OFDMA heterogeneous network

2016· article· en· W2419144360 on OpenAlexaff
Maria A. Seimeni, Panagiotis K. Gkonis, Dimitra I. Kaklamani, Iakovos S. Venieris, Christos Papavasiliou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsKensington Health
FundersEuropean Social FundNational Technical University of AthensEuropean Commission
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiple accessComputer scienceChannel state informationResource allocationResource management (computing)Interference (communication)Frequency-division multiple accessRadio resource managementHeterogeneous networkComputer networkOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingChannel (broadcasting)Distributed computingTelecommunicationsWireless networkWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, a Long Term Evolution Advanced (LTEa) - based multi-user Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) heterogeneous network has been simulated and a resource allocation strategy has been proposed. The strategy under consideration can inherently mitigate electromagnetic interference, hence increases the mean number of terminals, and requires no channel state information (CSI). To evaluate the performance of the network platform and the proposed strategy, the system is studied for different network orientations. According to the results, the platform is a good reality simulator, whereas owning to the proposed Radio Resource Management (RRM) algorithm the mean capacity can reach a 12-fold increase especially for highly noisy operating environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207