Longterm outcome of treatment of Felty's syndrome with intramuscular gold: case reports and recommendations for management.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence, complications, and course of Felty's syndrome (FS) in patients treated with intramuscular (IM) gold. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all FS cases (1979 to 2003) was conducted in the Mary Pack Arthritis Centre (MPAC) gold clinic. FS was diagnosed if patients had rheumatoid arthritis (RA; American College of Rheumatology criteria) and persistent leukopenia [white blood cell (WBC) count < 4] in the absence of other known causes of leukopenia. Splenomegaly was not part of the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with FS were identified in the gold clinic population. The mean age at diagnosis of FS was 58.7 years and the mean duration of RA at time of diagnosis was 6.9 years. The weekly dose of gold ranged from 10 mg to 50 mg depending on tolerability. Gold therapy resulted in normalization of the WBC count in 9 of 13 patients. The mean time to normalization of the WBC was 40 weeks. Only one patient with FS had experienced recurrent infectious complications from FS, and this did not recur after gold treatment was initiated. No patient had vasculitis. CONCLUSION: In our gold clinic population FS is a mild disease and is rarely associated with infectious complications. Gold is an effective treatment of FS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".