MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2419359138 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2016.39

Composition and Architecture of Braided and Sheetflood-Dominated Ephemeral Fluvial Strata In the Cambrian–Ordovician Potsdam Group: A Case Example of the Morphodynamics of Early Phanerozoic Fluvial Systems and Climate Change

2016· article· en· W2419359138 on OpenAlexaffabout
David G. Lowe, R. W. C. Arnott

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyFluvialEphemeral keyBeach morphodynamicsPaleontologyOrdovicianGroup (periodic table)PhanerozoicArchitectureEarth scienceStructural basinSedimentCenozoicArchaeologySediment transport

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Two fluvial facies associations, braided and ephemeral fluvial, are recognized in strata of the Cambrian–Ordovician Potsdam Group in the Ottawa Embayment and Quebec Basin in northeastern North America. Braided fluvial sedimentation was dominated by the migration of coarse-grained sandy dunes and rare unit bars and local gravels that built up low-relief 0.4–5-m-thick downstream-accreting compound bars in very wide and shallow braided channels. Rare meter-scale confluence scours, incision, and filling of decimeter-thick bypass channels, and thin (≤ 7 cm) overbank deposition also occurred. Ephemeral fluvial sedimentation was dominated by the progradation of lobate terminal splays, most of which were deflated and/or reworked into thin (10–95 cm) sheets by eolian processes during the long recurrence intervals between floods. These strata were locally incised by rare, 0.3–1.9-m-thick scour-filling high-energy supercritical bedform strata and decimeter-thick bypass channels. Both braided and ephemeral fluvial deposits consist of meter-scale stacked, high-order stratal units separated by horizontal, laterally extensive surfaces recording the recurring buildup, avulsion, and finally abandonment of channel belts. In braided fluvial strata of the Potsdam the dominance of thin (≤ 2 m) elongated compound bars with low-relief (≤ 5°) bar margins and internal accretion surfaces (≤ 15°) suggest that braided channels and in-channel compound bars expanded laterally with negligible increase in flow depth during periods of increased discharge in the absence of bank-stabilizing vegetation, similar to other examples of the pre-vegetated “sheet-braided” style. However, in areas where bedrock topography inhibited the lateral expansion of channels, thicker compound braid bars (1.2–3.5 m) with higher-relief accretion surfaces (up to 35°), like those observed in post-Silurian and modern systems, preferentially formed in relatively deep channels. Ephemeral fluvial deposits here are similar to ephemeral examples throughout geologic history in that they mostly comprise poorly confined sheet-like terminal splays that accumulated in topographic lows. However, compared to several post-Silurian examples, strata in the Potsdam exhibit considerably more eolian reworking of splays and preservation of supercritical-bedform strata, a manifestation of greater rates of surface-water infiltration due to a lack of sheltering by rooted plants and propensity for unconfined flooding. Finally, in the upper part of the Potsdam two regional ephemeral fluvial units are interstratified with two braided fluvial units, providing evidence for shifts in regional climate. The sharp, areally extensive surfaces that separate these fluvial systems are interpreted to approximate time lines, and therein provide a means for relative and absolute chronostratigraphic correlation. These changes are correlated with documented Late Cambrian to Earliest Ordovician global climate fluctuations, with semiarid conditions and related ephemeral fluvial systems corresponding to global cooling events at ca. 491 and 487 Ma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207