MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2419361880 · doi:10.7202/1036515ar

Le suicide dans les enquêtes du coroner au Québec entre 1763 et 1986 : un projet de recherche inédit1

2016· article· fr· W2419361880 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Patrice Corriveau, Isabelle Perreault, Jean-François Cauchie, Annie Lyonnais

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d histoire de l Amérique française · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCoronerPolitical scienceArtPoison controlSuicide prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette note de recherche porte sur la création d’une base de données qui rassemblera au final toutes les enquêtes du coroner qui ont conclu à un décès par suicide sur le territoire du Québec, et ce, de la Conquête britannique (1763) à 1986, soit plus ou moins 20 000 enquêtes. Riche de matériaux aussi précieux que des rapports médicaux, des témoignages de proches ou de professionnels d’horizons divers, des verdicts de jury et coroner ou encore des lettres d’adieu, cette base de données ne permettra pas seulement des analyses de type épidémiologique. Elle ouvrira aussi la voie à l’examen de l’évolution des discours sociaux qui accompagnent le geste suicidaire. Nous aborderons également le fait que la création et l’utilisation d’une telle base de données ne viennent pas sans leur lot de dilemmes épistémologiques et méthodologiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.014
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d histoire de l Amérique françaiseSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207