Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies of IgA nephropathy have demonstrated a number of prognostically significant clinical and pathological factors in groups of patients with the full histological spectrum of the disease. Whether these factors can be applied to a group of IgA nephropathy patients with disease of moderate degree is unknown. Forty patients (9 females, 31 males) with grade III IgA nephropathy (no more than 10% obsolete glomeruli and little or no interstitial fibrosis) were evaluated with respect to age, sex, degree of proteinuria, history of recurrent gross hematuria, hypertension, extent and type of segmental glomerulosclerosis, demonstration of IgG and/or IgM in deposits, presence of peripheral capillary deposits, whether or not there were crescents, and extent of vascular sclerosis. The mean age was 29.6 +/- (SD) 13.1 years. Sixteen patients presented with recurrent gross hematuria, and 24 had microscopic hematuria and proteinuria as the initial manifestation. Hypertension was seen in 5 patients. The mean serum creatinine concentration was 1.09 +/- 0.47 mg/dl (96.4 +/- 41.5 mumol/l), and the mean 24-hour urinary protein was 1.5 +/- 1.3 g. Nine patients had proteinuria greater than or equal to 2.0 g/24 h. Thirty-two patients demonstrated segmental glomerulosclerosis in their biopsies, 13 of which had more than 10% of the glomeruli involved. Seven patients developed established renal failure (Cr greater than or equal to 2.0 mg/dl; 176.8 mumol/l). The 60-and 100-month renal survival rates were 96 and 52%. Life table analysis disclosed that only the degree of proteinuria (greater than or equal to 2.0 g/24 h; p less than 0.05) and the extent of segmental glomerulosclerosis (p less than 0.025) were of prognostic significance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".