MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2419575847

Editorial: Teacher Librarians as Central Figures, Heroes, and Key Players

2016· editorial· en· W2419575847 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rebecca Hunt, Marcia A. Mardis

Bibliographic record

VenueSchool Libraries Worldwide · 2016
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)NarrativeSociologySchool libraryPsychologyMedia studiesLibrary sciencePedagogyLiteratureArtComputer scienceWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This theme of this issue of School Libraries Worldwide is Celebrity: Teacher Librarians as Central Figures, Heroes, and Key Players. Celebrities captivate our attention through the media and according to Gabler (1994), is a learning process toward self-actualization and realization...celebrity is about gaining attention and acknowledgment-about not being like everyone else (pp. 10, 13). As the sole information practitioner in a school, teacher librarians uniquely exhibit their celebrity status through the work they do to help students and stakeholders expand their knowledge, refine their skills, and locate the right information among the vast amount of materials that are available.Throughout the history of librarianship, we have many famous librarians, many of whom were politicians, authors and historical celebrities in their own right: Ben Franklin, Golda Meir, J. Edgar Hoover, Lewis Carroll, Beverly Cleary, Madeleine L'Engle, Marcel Proust, Joanna Cole and Jacob Grimm. Celebrity librarians Melvil Dewey and Nancy Pearl earned their status through their excellent professional service. While exemplary librarians can be found in every aspect of history, thousands of school and public librarians that have gained recognition for their inspiring educators and learners. In this issue, we celebrate school librarians and their contributions to their communities.Becoming a Celebrity in Your School LibrarySchool librarians are central figures in their schools; their reputations precede them when students, teachers, administrators, parents and staffenter the school library. According to Gabler (1994, p.14), celebrity narrative and the celebrity's tangibility are about identification; indeed, while a school librarian can be considered an effective educator outside of the school library, rarely is a school library considered effective without a strong school library. The school librarian's narrative is one that includes supporting, inspiring, and guiding students' development with expertise, resources, and ingenuity. The school librarians' celebrity narrative is defined by excellence and when this narrative is one of exemplary service, everyone knows the school librarian's name and capabilities: this person is in the spotlight.The selflessness of this celebrity can be seen in so many ways. Almost all school librarians have those special students who seek refuge in the library and build a rapport around the enjoyable library atmosphere. This environment of information sharing, friendly debate, and a supportive adult is often not accessible elsewhere during the school day. The celebrity school librarian provides a safe haven for difficult questions and away from judgment or retaliation. A school librarian's narrative that includes open communication, trust, honesty, and availability is a legacy that forever influences how everyone in the school community views the library.In This IssueIn this issue, researchers from all over the world provided us with a range of papers that explore librarians in leadership roles; librarians and their use of technology; librarians marketing and promoting programs and materials; and librarians as agents of change and innovation.We lead this issue of 10 exciting papers with a thought provoking contribution to our Researcher's Perspective column by renowned researcher and writer Stephen Krashen. In Purpose of Education, Free Voluntary Reading, and Dealing with the Impact of Poverty, Dr. Krashen implores school-based information professionals to promote, implement, and reinforce children's love of reading in the face of sweeping international educational reforms that often affect available time to read. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0150.008
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0170.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchool Libraries WorldwideSame topicLibrary Science and AdministrationFrench-language works237,207