MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2419625084

Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Diversification During Times of Crisis: Challenges and Opportunities for Newfoundland

2016· article· en· W2419625084 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Benjamin Spigel

Bibliographic record

VenueEdinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCommunity Development and Social Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiversification (marketing strategy)EntrepreneurshipEconomic geographyRegional sciencePolitical scienceBusinessEconomyGeographyEconomicsMarketing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current crash in global oil prices has shown the importance of diversifying economies away from dependence on oil extraction and towards higher value services both within the resource industry and in unrelated industries. Innovation both within the oil and gas industry (by entering the global value chain) or within unrelated industries (such as by applying ROV technology for building offshore wind farms) help detach the economy from dependence on a single economic engine and make it more resilient to economic shocks.<br/><br/>The oil and gas industry in Newfoundland has created a strong foundation for economic development; they contributed to a concentration of human and financial capital in the region that can serve as a platform for continued economic development. Entrepreneurs can potentially use this human and financial capital to diversify the economy away from depending on resource prices However, the same forces that help build up these stocks of capital and skills also create barriers to diversification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.304
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.001 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh)Same topicCommunity Development and Social ImpactFrench-language works237,207