Responses of Ankle Extensor and Flexor Motoneurons to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex excites limb muscles of the contralateral side of the body. Reports of poorly defined, or a complete lack of systematic excitatory responses of soleus motoneurons compared with those of tibialis anterior (TA) motoneurons has led to the proposal that while all ankle flexor motoneurons receive strong corticomotoneuronal connections, very few soleus motoneurons do. In addition, the connections to these few motoneurons are weak. The nature of corticomotoneuronal connections onto these two motoneuron pools was re-evaluated in the following experiments. The leg area of the left motor cortex was stimulated with a large double-cone coil using Magstim 200, while surface electromyographic (EMG) and single motor unit (SMU) responses were recorded from soleus and TA muscles of healthy adult subjects. Under resting conditions, the onset (25-30 ms) and duration of concomitantly recorded short latency motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in surface EMG from both muscles were similar. The input-output relationships of the simultaneously recorded soleus and TA EMG responses showed much greater increases in TA MEPs compared with soleus MEPs with identical increases in stimulus intensity. Under resting and nonisometric conditions, a later peak with onset latency of approximately 100 ms was observed in soleus. During isometric conditions or with vibration of the TA tendon, the second soleus peak was abolished indicating reflex origin of this peak. Recordings from 42 soleus and 39 TA motor units showed clear response peaks in the peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs) of every unit. Two statistical tests were done to determine the onset and duration of response peaks in the PSTHs. With chi(2) test, the duration was 6.9 +/- 4.2 ms (mean +/- SD) for soleus and 5.1 +/- 2.1 ms for TA. Using the criterion of discerning a peak by bin counts being three SDs above background, the duration was 10.0 +/- 4.4 ms for soleus and 7.8 +/- 2.6 ms for TA. Results of these experiments do not suggest a lack of systematic corticomotoneuronal connections on soleus motoneurons when compared with those on TA, though some differences in the strengths of corticomotoneuronal connections onto the two pools do exist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".