MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2420012326 · doi:10.1002/rob.21655

Robust Monocular Visual Teach and Repeat Aided by Local Ground Planarity and Color‐constant Imagery

2016· article· en· W2420012326 on OpenAlexafffund
Lee Clement, Jonathan Kelly, Timothy D. Barfoot

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Field Robotics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer visionRobustness (evolution)Artificial intelligenceMonocularComputer scienceGround planeMonocular vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visual Teach and Repeat (VT&R) allows an autonomous vehicle to accurately repeat a previously traversed route using only vision sensors. Most VT&R systems rely on natively three‐dimensional (3D) sensors such as stereo cameras for mapping and localization, but many existing mobile robots are equipped with only 2D monocular vision, typically for teleoperation. In this paper, we extend VT&R to the most basic sensor configuration—a single monocular camera. We show that kilometer‐scale route repetition can be achieved with centimeter‐level accuracy by approximating the local ground surface near the vehicle as a plane with some uncertainty. This allows our system to recover absolute scale from the known position and orientation of the camera relative to the vehicle, which simplifies threshold‐based outlier rejection and the estimation and control of lateral path‐tracking error—essential components of high‐accuracy route repetition. We enhance the robustness of our monocular VT&R system to common failure cases through the use of color‐constant imagery, which provides it with a degree of resistance to lighting changes and moving shadows where keypoint matching on standard gray images tends to struggle. Through extensive testing on a combined 30 km of autonomous navigation data collected on multiple vehicles in a variety of highly nonplanar terrestrial and planetary‐analogue environments, we demonstrate that our system is capable of achieving route‐repetition accuracy on par with its stereo counterpart, with only a modest tradeoff in robustness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Field RoboticsSame topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207