MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2420110223 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2016.2572666

Fold-based Kolmogorov–Smirnov Modulation Classifier

2016· article· en· W2420110223 on OpenAlexafffund
Fanggang Wang, Octavia A. Dobre, Chung Chan, Jingwen Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Signal Modulation Classification
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesState Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and SafetyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsClassifier (UML)Computer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Robustness (evolution)Artificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionPhase-shift keyingMachine learningAlgorithmBit error rateDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modulation classification is crucial in applications such as electronic warfare and interference cancellation. In this letter, a novel feature-based Kolmogorov-Smirnov classifier is proposed for the identification of the modulation formats. The received signal is first preprocessed with a folding operation that helps identify the modulation formats based on their different axes of symmetry. Simulation results show that the performance of the proposed classifier is close to that of the optimal likelihood-based classifier, while its robustness to noise uncertainty is improved and its computational complexity is reduced compared to that of the optimal likelihood-based classifier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing LettersSame topicWireless Signal Modulation ClassificationFrench-language works237,207