Reformulating the Integrated Care Concept for the New Millennium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of integrated care advocates a planned approach to predialysis care. Its components include timely referral to a renal care team, timely preparation for dialysis, and timely initiation of dialysis, with peritoneal dialysis (PD) as the initial therapy for suitable patients. This initial therapy may then be followed by timely transfer to hemodialysis (HD) when residual renal function declines or when other PD-related problems occur. We argue that at least three problems exist with the integrated care approach as it is currently being articulated. They are (1) an under emphasis on slowing the rate of progression of chronic kidney disease, aggressive management of cardiovascular risk factors and other comorbidities, and pre-emptive live donor transplantation; (2) a lack of consideration of home HD as an alternate initial therapy; and (3) a lack of discussion about patient choice. We propose a modified version of integrated care that we believe will optimize modality distribution and patient outcomes, while reducing the relative costs per patient treated, compared to the current situation in most countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".