Le mouvement européen pour le désarmement nucléaire et le non-alignement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’auteur souligne la variété et la diversité des mouvements pour le désarmement de l’Europe de l’Ouest. Il suggère de regarder le groupe Désarmement nucléaire en Europe (DNE/END) non pas comme un groupe de coordination des autres militants en Europe mais bien comme un groupe ayant apporté une contribution originale. De fait, l’effort de ce groupe réside dans la réflexion qu’il a su susciter par la publication d’un document intitulé « Appeal for European Nuclear Disarmament » et qu’il a nourri par la suite, par une série de conférences auxquelles il a accollé son nom (END). L’auteur fournit une série d’arguments favorables à l’option du non-alignement pour les mouvements européens et démontre la nature du questionnement fondamental que ce choix soulève.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".