MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W242119756

A Great Plains Reader

2005· article· en· W242119756 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Folklore · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisionHistoryVariety (cybernetics)Theme (computing)Art historySociologyAnthropology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Great Reader. Edited by Diane D. Quantic and P. Jane Hafen. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2003. Pp. xxii + 730, foreword, introduction, index of works. $70.00 cloth, $35.00 paper) As a fifteen-year resident of South Dakota, and as one who wrote a dissertation on Willa Gather, I believe that an anthology devoted to the Great in all its expanse and variety, is long overdue. Unfortunately, Diane D. Quantic and P. Jane Hafen's Great Reader is not that anthology. Despite its length, this volume simply does not do justice to the diverse issues and peoples of the Great and instead settles for reinforcing standard, outdated visions of a region that it never even clearly defines. According to the book's introduction,Toward a Definition of the Great Plains, Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, and North Dakota, along with the southern portions of the Canadian provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan, form the core for any definition of the Great Plains (xvii). Yet Minnesota authors are included, most notably Garrison Keillor. The presence of pieces by Keillor is especially puzzling. The claim that he qualifies as a Great writer because although his prairie is geographically a bit east of the Great metaphorically it is familiar terrain for Great (650) comes off as a weak excuse to add a well-known humorist's work to the book. Given the nationwide popularity of Keillor's radio show, A Prairie Home Companion, one could claim that Keillor's literary terrain is metaphorically familiar to residents of a great many places, but this does not make him a Great writer any more than it makes him a New England writer. Instead of Keillor's work, why not include selections from the equally entertaining Roger Welsch, a Nebraskan? And if Minnesota is somehow on the eastern rim of the Great why not look west and encompass the near portions of Wyoming and Montana, which are equally Plains-like, so we can add in works by the well-known and often-anthologized Gretel Ehrlich? Her essay collection The Solace of Open Spaces (1986) beautifully describes Great people, land, and issues. She could also provide another female voice in the volume, which includes nearly twice as many male as female authors. It is disappointing that our Reader, however subtly or unintentionally, appears to be endorsing the longstanding stereotype of the west as somehow exclusively a white man's domain. Aside from selections by a number of Native American and a very few African American writers, pieces by persons of color are lacking. Yet the population of the Great has never been entirely homogeneous and has become increasingly less so in recent years. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it