Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A Great Reader. Edited by Diane D. Quantic and P. Jane Hafen. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2003. Pp. xxii + 730, foreword, introduction, index of works. $70.00 cloth, $35.00 paper) As a fifteen-year resident of South Dakota, and as one who wrote a dissertation on Willa Gather, I believe that an anthology devoted to the Great in all its expanse and variety, is long overdue. Unfortunately, Diane D. Quantic and P. Jane Hafen's Great Reader is not that anthology. Despite its length, this volume simply does not do justice to the diverse issues and peoples of the Great and instead settles for reinforcing standard, outdated visions of a region that it never even clearly defines. According to the book's introduction,Toward a Definition of the Great Plains, Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, and North Dakota, along with the southern portions of the Canadian provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan, form the core for any definition of the Great Plains (xvii). Yet Minnesota authors are included, most notably Garrison Keillor. The presence of pieces by Keillor is especially puzzling. The claim that he qualifies as a Great writer because although his prairie is geographically a bit east of the Great metaphorically it is familiar terrain for Great (650) comes off as a weak excuse to add a well-known humorist's work to the book. Given the nationwide popularity of Keillor's radio show, A Prairie Home Companion, one could claim that Keillor's literary terrain is metaphorically familiar to residents of a great many places, but this does not make him a Great writer any more than it makes him a New England writer. Instead of Keillor's work, why not include selections from the equally entertaining Roger Welsch, a Nebraskan? And if Minnesota is somehow on the eastern rim of the Great why not look west and encompass the near portions of Wyoming and Montana, which are equally Plains-like, so we can add in works by the well-known and often-anthologized Gretel Ehrlich? Her essay collection The Solace of Open Spaces (1986) beautifully describes Great people, land, and issues. She could also provide another female voice in the volume, which includes nearly twice as many male as female authors. It is disappointing that our Reader, however subtly or unintentionally, appears to be endorsing the longstanding stereotype of the west as somehow exclusively a white man's domain. Aside from selections by a number of Native American and a very few African American writers, pieces by persons of color are lacking. Yet the population of the Great has never been entirely homogeneous and has become increasingly less so in recent years. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,010 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle