Parents' perceptions of chronic illness trajectories.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The notion of a small, generic set of chronic illness trajectories that can be independent of specific medical diagnoses, though controversial, has some theoretical, clinical, and qualitative research support. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively describe trajectories among parents of children with a chronic condition. It was hypothesized that factor analysis would confirm 3 trajectories similar to those in the qualitative literature and that parents' perceptions of their child's trajectory would differ significantly from medically based perceptions. A total of 140 parents provided data on their perceptions of the past, present, and future course of the condition of their repeatedly hospitalized child. Fourteen time-related items from the Coping Health Inventory for Parents Questionnaire on Resources and Stress and the Parenting Stress Index were analyzed. Pre- and post-hospitalization factor analyses extracted the same 8 items to construct 3 trajectories: Life Threatening; Declining; and Stable, Optimistic. The views of approximately one third of the parents differed from medically based classifications. Type of nursing care had no bearing on the perceptions of the parents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".