Modelo teórico para el cálculo de las solubilidades mutuas entre gases no-polares y agua con sales disueltas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el presente artículo se propone un modelo teórico para el cálculo del equilibrio químico de fases entre gases no-polares y agua.Este modelo es aplicable completamente a sistemas acuosos puros o con sales disueltas.En ambos casos el modelo proporciona predicciones válidas hasta 647 K, presiones de hasta 2 kilo-bares, y concentraciones de sales disueltas iguales a la saturación del sólido mineral.El modelo termodinámico hace uso de una ecuación de estado para reproducir datos experimentales en todas las fases excepto en la fase líquida del agua.Para esta última se utiliza la constante de Henry.En el caso de la presencia de sales, el potencial químico del soluto gas en la fase líquida del agua está relacionada al potencial químico del soluto en la salmuera a través del coeficiente de Setschenov.Estos coeficientes se pueden derivar de datos experimentales de solubilidad.Con el modelo se pueden reproducir todos los fenómenos de solubilidad cruciales, incluyendo el equilibrio entre tres fases.Sin embargo con las ecuaciones propuestas no se pueden reproducir los fenómenos gas-gas que ocurren en la vecindad del punto crítico del agua ni el equilibrio sólido-liquido que ocurre en los hidratos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".