MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2421818369 · doi:10.5539/mas.v10n10p23

Modeling and Analysis of Cooling Coil for Control System Design Using Gray Box Approach

2016· article· en· W2421818369 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Masoud H. Nazari, Ali Ghaffari

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHVACFan coil unitAir conditioningComputer scienceElectromagnetic coilControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear autoregressive exogenous modelArtificial neural networkAutoregressive modelNonlinear systemControl engineeringSimulationControl (management)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the study is to design a method analyzing dynamic behavior of cooling coil in order to be applicable in online simulations. Coils account for the highest energy consumers among other components in an Air Handling Unit (AHU). Essential data as input-output of neural network is provided using energy and mass conservation equations. An implicit numerical method is used to solve dynamic equations of coil. The results of mathematical methods are applied in the output of neural network to design an online model. The proposed model is based on an active coil used in Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems of clean rooms in Iran Pasteur Institute. Since in active air handlers, input and outputs are not measured, here we model air conditioning systems generally. The results in comparison with actual system data indicate an acceptable performance of the proposed method, so that combination of numerical results with a nonlinear autoregressive exogenous model (NARX) makes it possible to control system effectively by saving a significant amount of time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207