MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2421883786 · doi:10.1002/mma.4710

Minimal time for the approximate bilinear control of Schrödinger equations

2018· article· en· W2421883786 on OpenAlexafffund
Karine Beauchard, Jean‐Michel Coron, Holger Teismann

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsControllabilityMathematicsBilinear interpolationUnit sphereQuantumClass (philosophy)Schrödinger equationMathematical analysisPure mathematicsApplied mathematicsQuantum mechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a quantum particle in a potential V(x) subject to a time‐dependent (and spatially homogeneous) electric field E(t) (the control). Boscain, Caponigro, Chambrion, and Sigalotti proved that, under generic assumptions on V, this system is approximately controllable on the unit sphere, in sufficiently large time T. In the present article, we show that, for a large class of initial states (dense in unit sphere), approximate controllability does not hold in arbitrarily small time. This generalizes our previous result for Gaussian initial conditions. Furthermore, we prove that the minimal time can in fact be arbitrarily large.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Methods in the Applied SciencesSame topicAdvanced Mathematical Physics ProblemsFrench-language works237,207