MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2421926607 · doi:10.1287/trsc.2015.0636

A Benders Decomposition Approach for the Symmetric TSP with Generalized Latency Arising in the Design of Semiflexible Transit Systems

2016· article· en· W2421926607 on OpenAlexafffund
Fausto Errico, Teodor Gabriel Crainic, Federico Malucelli, Maddalena Nonato

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité de Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre interuniversitaire de recherche sur les reseaux d'entreprise, la logistique et le transportUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsTravelling salesman problemSolverMathematical optimizationLatency (audio)Routing (electronic design automation)Computer scienceClass (philosophy)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the symmetric traveling salesman problem with generalized latency (TSP-GL) a new problem arising in the planning of the important class of semiflexible transit systems. The TSP-GL can be seen as a very challenging variant of the symmetric traveling salesman problem (S-TSP), where the objective function combines the usual cost of the circuit with a routing component accounting for the passenger travel times. The main contributions of the paper include the formulation of the problems in terms of multicommodity flows, the study of its mathematical properties, and the introduction of a branch-and-cut approach based on Benders reformulation taking advantage of properties that relate the feasible region of the TSP-GL and the S-TSP polyhedron. An extensive computational experimentation compares a number of variants of the proposed algorithm, as well as a commercial solver. These experiments show that the method we propose significantly outperforms a well-known commercial solver and obtains good-quality solutions to realistically sized instances within short computational times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation ScienceSame topicVehicle Routing Optimization MethodsFrench-language works237,207