[Contribution of public health to paediatric physical disability rehabilitation units].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Approximately 4% of children in North America and Europe live with a chronic disability. Most countries have developed a range of specialized health services to meet the specific needs of these children. However, an increasing number of authors argue that more public health activities should be offered to children with disabilities in order to promote social participation and to ensure more efficient organization of these services. The objectives of this article are: 1) to describe the needs of children with physical disabilities that can be met bypublic health activities, 2) to present the Quebec health care system and discuss the inclusion of public health principles in paediatric rehabilitation services, and 3) to propose ways to improve integration of these principles. METHODS: The needs of children with disabilities are described according to categories of needs from the Life Needs Model: basic skills; applied skills; needs support, education and information for children, family and community. The patterns of paediatric rehabilitation services and service organization in Quebec were analysed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Services for children with physical disabilities are primarily intended to develop basic and applied skills. The mandate of institutions delivering specialized services and waiting lists could limit the possibilities to provide services able to meet all of the needs of disabled children. Integration of public health activities would ensure greater complementarity and further promote social participation. Some approaches providing interesting avenues to further integrate public health in paediatric rehabilitation services are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.085 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".