MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2423014320 · doi:10.5430/jnep.v6n10p101

Human resource management practices and nursing turnover

2016· article· en· W2423014320 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kent V. Rondeau, Terry H. Wagar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurnoverHuman resource managementBusinessHuman resourcesNursingQuality (philosophy)Employee engagementHealth carePublic relationsKnowledge managementMedicineManagementPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The objective of this study is to explore the nature of the association of discrete systems of human resource management practices and the rate of voluntary turnover of registered nurses (RNs) in a large sample of Canadian acute care hospitals and nursing homes. Turnover of nursing staff is a significant issue affecting healthcare cost, quality and access. The rate of annual turnover for registered nurses has been estimated to be about 20 percent in Canada, with a total cost of almost US$27,000 for each RN. Healthcare organizations that employ large numbers of registered nurses are keen to learn more about the role that organizational policies and practices play in reducing voluntary turnover, including the role of management and its deployment of human resources. The relationship of human resource management (HRM) practices and employee turnover has generally been under-investigated. Three HRM systems, composed of bundles of discrete workplace and employment practices, were assembled in order to assess the relationship of HRM practice systems with the rate of voluntary RN turnover, at the establishment level. The three HRM practice systems constructed are: a technical HRM system that focuses on policies and practices that regulate the employee-employer relationship; a quality-of-worklife HRM system that includes a variety of employee- and family-friendly employment practices; a high-involvement HRM system that involve workplace arrangements that increase commitment, engagement and participation of employees. Method and analysis: A questionnaire was sent to the chief nursing officers of 2,208 hospitals and long-term care facilities in every province and territory of Canada, yielding valid responses from 705 establishments. Each of the three HRM practice systems is estimated at each facility and comprises eight (8) discrete employment and workplace practices. Using estimates of voluntary RN turnover as the dependent variable, the analysis featured a step-wise ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model for each practice system. Results: After controlinf for facility characteristics and local labour market conditions, the quality-of-worklife HRM employment system ( p <.05) and high-involvement HRM works system ( p <.05) are found to be associated with lower voluntary turnover, yet their overall relationship with facility turnover appears to be quite modest. Our technical HRM system is not found to be associated with facility RN turnover. Conclusion: HRM systems comprising employee-friendly employment practices and nursing high-involvement work practices may play a significant (yet modest) role in reducing RN turnover.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.398 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing Education and PracticeSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207