MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2424113023 · doi:10.1109/maes.2016.150117

Aggressive congestion control mechanism for space systems

2016· article· en· W2424113023 on OpenAlexaff
Jingjing Wang, Chunxiao Jiang, Haijun Zhang, Yong Ren, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed systems and fault tolerance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpacecraftSpace (punctuation)The InternetSpace explorationNASA Deep Space NetworkComputer scienceSpace technologySpace environmentSatellitePoint (geometry)Aerospace engineeringDeep space explorationSystems engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of a space system of systems (SoS) is becoming a key consideration in space communication, navigation, and Earth observation. The space SoS is defined as a network of assets on the Earth, in orbit around the Earth, in orbit around solar system bodies and on the surface of solar system bodies that is interconnected and/or interoperated to perform a mission, and/or provide services that cannot be performed by monolithic space systems alone. However, current space information systems are basically operated in a point-to-point pattern between the control center and the spacecrafts, which are only adequate for the individual space missions rather than collaborative missions. In other words, the ground network, space network, and the deep-space network evolve independently and focus on their individual communication regimes. To address these issues, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has developed an integrated space system that integrates the Internet protocols, routers, and interfaces into space networks [3], [4]. The space system, which is also called space Internet, enables large quantities of collaborative operations of those networks. Therefore, the integrated space Internet is essentially an SoS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems MagazineSame topicDistributed systems and fault toleranceFrench-language works237,207