Aggressive congestion control mechanism for space systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of a space system of systems (SoS) is becoming a key consideration in space communication, navigation, and Earth observation. The space SoS is defined as a network of assets on the Earth, in orbit around the Earth, in orbit around solar system bodies and on the surface of solar system bodies that is interconnected and/or interoperated to perform a mission, and/or provide services that cannot be performed by monolithic space systems alone. However, current space information systems are basically operated in a point-to-point pattern between the control center and the spacecrafts, which are only adequate for the individual space missions rather than collaborative missions. In other words, the ground network, space network, and the deep-space network evolve independently and focus on their individual communication regimes. To address these issues, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has developed an integrated space system that integrates the Internet protocols, routers, and interfaces into space networks [3], [4]. The space system, which is also called space Internet, enables large quantities of collaborative operations of those networks. Therefore, the integrated space Internet is essentially an SoS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it