MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2424133546 · doi:10.2138/am-2004-2-319

Identification of pyrite valence band contributions using synchrotron-excited X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

2004· article· en· W2424133546 on OpenAlexaff
H.W. Nesbitt, Andrea Berlich, Sarah L. Harmer, I. Uhlig, G.M. Bancroft, R. Szargan

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMolecular orbitalValence (chemistry)Binding energyOrbital hybridisationAtomic orbitalAtomic physicsSemimetalMolecular orbital theoryMolecular physicsMoleculePhysicsSiliconElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The major contributions to the pyrite valence band have been identified experimentally by monitoring XPS valence band signal intensity as a function of photon (X-ray source) energy. The S-S σ and σ* orbitals are located at about 13 and 16 eV binding energy and are almost exclusively derived from S 3s-S 3s mixing; there is no experimental evidence for a S 3p contribution to these molecular orbital (molecular orbital) values as required for sp3 hybridization. Fe-S σ (Fe 3deg-S 3pz derived) and Fe-S π and π* (Fe 3dt2g-S 3px,y derived) molecular orbitals are identified at Binding Energies (B.E.) less than 8 eV, and are consistent with energies calculated by Eyert et al. (1998). Fe-S π molecular orbital contributions are located in the valence band between about 1.8 and 3 eV and Fe-S π* molecular orbitals contribute between about 0.7 to 1.5 eV binding energy. Contributions observed at the top of the valence band and concentrated between the Fermi level and about 0.6 eV B.E. may be derived from Fe 3deg (non-bonding) orbitals. The experimental data are consistent with these non-bonding contributions being derived from surface Fe species (Fe electronic surface states), and perhaps represent the Fe 3deg "dangling bonds" produced by rupture of Fe-S σ bonds during fracture. The conformity of spectral assignments based on experimental data with band theoretical calculations (of Eyert et al. 1998, using a basis set appropriate to pyrite) indicates that the essential aspects of the pyrite valence band are understood and energetically quantified. Additional study is required to identify positively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicMetal Extraction and BioleachingFrench-language works237,207