Efficacy of surgical salvage for advanced neck metastases after radiotherapy failure.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy of surgical salvage in patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma to the neck of stage N2 or N3 initially treated with radiotherapy. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary care institution. METHODS: Four hundred and twenty-five patients received neck dissection at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre between 1990 and 1996. Sixty-one patients had neck dissection for salvage after radical radiotherapy for advanced neck disease of stage N2 or N3. These patients were selected from the Sunnybrook Head and Neck Database and reviewed. OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival and recurrence. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients underwent neck dissection for salvage after radiotherapy. Five-year overall survival was 30%. The majority (72%) failed locoregionally after surgical salvage. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical salvage after radiotherapy for advanced neck disease has a 30% 5-year survival rate. Surgical salvage after radiotherapy for advanced neck disease is effective in a minority of patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".