Estimation of genotypic correlation and heritability of apricot traits, using restricted maximum likelihood in repeated measures data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In estimation of genetic parameters in perennial tree species on the basis of analysis of variance (ANOVA), heterogeneity of years and genotype × environment interaction for data sets during the juvenility to maturity life period is ignored. Therefore, a linear mixed model based on restricted maximum likelihood (REML) approximation for modeling of covariance structure of longitudinal data can improve our ability to analyze repeated measures data. In the present research, a modeling of variance-covariance structure by mixed model based on the REML approach has been used for characteristics of 26 apricot genotypes recorded during three years. Fitting unstructured covariance (UN) models for all traits indicated a great heterogeneity of variances among repeated years and the trends of response variables in the genotypes (except for RWC) was due to imperfect correlation of subjects measured in different years. Based on the same structure, positive correlations were estimated among fruit set, potassium content, and yield of pistil in repetitive years, and most traits showed high heritability estimation. To our knowledge, this is the first report in plant that genotypic correlation and heritability and their standard errors are estimated in a repeated measures data over years using REML approximation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".