MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2425029566 · doi:10.1097/pcc.0b013e31823db226

Advancing Our Understanding of the Psychological Impact of PICU Hospitalization

2015· letter· en· W2425029566 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Janet E. Rennick

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2015
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFamily medicineUniversity hospitalNursingGerontologyLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Department of Nursing Research and Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, The Montreal Children’s Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Ingram School of Nursing; and Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada * See also p. e113. Dr. Rennick is a Le Fonds de Recherche du Québec–Santé (FRQ–S) Clinical Research Scholar, and is a member of the Research Institute of the McGill University Centre, which is supported in party by the FRQ–S.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.009
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0180.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.181
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsFrench-language works237,207