Reproductive ecology of the distylous species <i>Houstonia longifolia</i>: implications for conservation of a rare species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distylous species typically experience self-incompatibility with one morph often having partial self-compatibility. Small populations may therefore experience greater rates of selfing/intramorph crosses leading to skewed morph ratios and reduced seed production. For the distylous species Houstonia longifolia Gaertn. (“imperiled” at its northwestern range limit in Alberta), we examined whether small populations were morph-biased and whether seed production was affected by population size, local density, plant size, morph type, and surrounding morph ratio. For focal plants in several populations, we measured size (height, number of stems) and local density (1 m2) of pins and thrums, with the focal plants collected for seed counts. Population size was estimated from densities in systematically located quadrats in each population. Morph ratios were pin-biased in small populations but were even to slightly thrum-biased in large populations. The critical population size for maintaining an equal morph ratio was ∼726 plants. Seed production was most influenced by the interaction between morph type and surrounding morph ratio, which were themselves influenced by population size (Allee effect). Seed production increased for thrums but decreased for pins as the proportion of surrounding pins increased, suggesting strong incompatibility. These results provide guidance on population size and morph ratios for conservation actions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".