Preparation, Manipulation, and Pulse Strategy for One-Dimensional Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (ODPFGE)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The preparation and manipulation of very large DNA molecules for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) requires more care than normally used for smaller molecules. The general protocol used is the preparation of DNA directly in solid agarose blocks (plugs) or beads. Intact cells are encapsidated in agarose (plugs or beads) and are treated with different combinations of enzymes and detergent to remove cell walls, membranes, RNA, proteins, and other materials in order to obtain naked DNA. This is possible because detergent and enzymes can diffuse by Brownian motion through the agarose pores of the plug, whereas the large pieces of DNA cannot and remain sequestered inside the plug. Here, we give detailed protocols of preparation for yeast and mammalian DNA. In addition, we describe the power supplies, switchers, gels, and gel trays required for one-dimensional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (ODPFGE), as well as the pulse strategies used for the separations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".