Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article montre les limites de l’institutionnalisation de l’approche globale dans la pratique des militaires européens en opération. Une analyse d’EUFOR Tchad/ RCA fait ressortir deux observations contrastées. Certes, l’approche globale trouve un écho favorable auprès des militaires européens, en ce qu’elle leur permet de développer de nouvelles compétences professionnelles et sociales au contact les uns des autres et avec les autres acteurs du champ de la sécurité européenne. L’approche globale est une norme qui contribue pour les militaires à donner du sens au rôle de l’UE comme acteur de la gestion des crises. Cependant, sa mise en œuvre sur le terrain donne lieu à un assemblage de pratiques diverses et au rejet par les militaires d’un certain nombre de ses principes, dès lors que ces derniers mettent en danger la conduite des opérations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".