MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2425858393 · doi:10.2118/180830-ms

The Viability of Oil Extraction from Trinidad Tar Sands by Radio Frequency Heating - A Simulation Approach

2016· article· en· W2425858393 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Trinidad and Tobago Section Energy Resources Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Energy and Energy IndustriesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsOil sandsOverburdenEnvironmental sciencePetroleum engineeringDielectric heatingRadio frequencytar (computing)Materials scienceGeologyAsphaltMining engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringDielectricComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Trinidad has tar sands resources of about 2 billion barrels of oil on land in the Parrylands/Guapo and Brighton areas. With an oil price of over USD 25 per barrel, commercial extraction of oil from Trinidad tar sands is viable but requires careful study. The relatively small extent of this tar sand (about 10,000 acres and with depths varying from surface to less than 500 feet) and with an oil in place of about 1000 times smaller than the Canadian tar sands, large scale surface mining and in-situ methods such as SAGD and VAPEX processes or their variants are not practical and also for environmental reasons. In this study we explore the viability of oil extraction from Trinidad tar sands by radio frequency (RF) heating. RF heating does not require an overburden and is cheaper than SAGD and VAPEX and is also environmentally friendly since no steam, water and solvents are needed. Studies have also shown RF heating to be uniform, quicker and with deeper penetration than direct electrical (resistive) heating and an oil recovery between 50 to 80 % can be achieved. Preliminary studies indicated that Trinidad tar sands are wetting and with permittivity in the range 38 −100, which makes it suitable for RF heating. The COMSOL Multiphysics® software was used to simulate oil sand samples contained within a copper chamber and the RF heating was applied via a dipole antenna. Temperature- time heating plots were generated using an operating frequency of 10 MHz and a current of 50 Amperes. This data and the physical properties of the tar sands were then simulated using the CMG software. The results indicated an oil recovery in the range 30-60%. An energy balance was then conducted and the results show that commercial extraction of oil from Trinidad tar sands by RF heating is viable with an oil price of over USD 25 per barrel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.743

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it