An Automated Approach for Kidney Segmentation in Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Automated segmentation of kidneys in three-dimensional (3-D) abdominal ultrasound volumes is a task of paramount importance in automated diagnosis of abdominal trauma. However, ultrasound speckle noise, low-contrast boundaries, partial kidney occlusion, and probe misalignment restrict the utility of the solution, especially when it is used in emergency rooms and Focused Assessment with Sonography Trauma applications. This paper introduces a systematic and cost-effective method capable of detecting and segmenting the kidney's shape in acquired 3-D ultrasound volumes, using off-line training datasets. This paper offers a new shape model representation, called the complex-valued implicit shape model, to generate a 3-D kidney shape model by combining prior knowledge of training shapes and anatomical knowledge. We apply shape-to-volume registration, based on a new similarity metric, to detect the kidney shape by fitting the 3-D shape model on 3-D ultrasound volumes. Upon kidney detection, the fitted shape model is used to initialize and evolve a new level-set function, called complex-valued rational level-set with shape prior, to segment the kidney's shape. Experimentation using both simulated and actual ultrasound volumes indicate that the proposed solution provides a better performance over the state-of-the-art volumetric ultrasound segmentation methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".