MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2426035910 · doi:10.5430/wje.v6n3p66

Evaluation of Sensory Skills among Students with Visual Impairment

2016· article· en· W2426035910 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Suhaib Yousif Saleem, Mohammad Mousa AL-Salahat

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Education · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTactile and Sensory Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNajran University
KeywordsPsychologyTasteVisual impairmentSensory systemVisually impairedScale (ratio)Low visionCognitive psychologyMedicineOptometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the sensory skills among students with visual impairment(SVI). The samplecontained of 30 students with blind and low vision enrolled in mainstreaming programs at general education schoolsat Najran in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. A sensory skills scale was developed. The scale consisted of 20 items wasdistributed on four domains related to skills of touch, hearing, taste, and smell. The scale was applied on the sampleof study by collaboration with teachers of SVI. The results showed that the degree of possessing sensory skills ofvisually impaired students was moderate. Moreover, there were significant differences in the skills of touch, taste andsmell in favor of low vision students and in the skills of hearing in favor of blind students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of EducationSame topicTactile and Sensory InteractionsFrench-language works237,207