MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2426657832

Codon usage analysis of Ascaris species influence of base and intercodon frequencies on the synonymous codon usage.

2002· article· en· W2426657832 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Fadiel, Stuart Lithwick, Maha M M Abou Gamra

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCodon usage biasSpeed wobbleAmino acidBiologyWobble base pairGeneticsLeucineGenomeSerineGenePhysicsRNAPhosphorylation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patterns of codon usage and bias were characterized in the genus Ascaris. Furthermore, the influence of base composition and intercodon frequencies on codon usage was investigated using freely available analytical software. Results showed that A and T were present in the genome at a higher frequency than G and C. As well, codons with AT base pairs at the wobble position were used more often than those with GC at this site, suggesting that the bias extends to the codon level. The presence of T at the intercodon position inhibited the use of codon with A at the wobble site. With respect to amino acid frequency, Serine, Leucine, and Arginine accounted for a disproportionately large fraction of the overall amino acid distribution per gene, implying that the bias was also conserved at the protein level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms→French-language works237,207→