MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2426922068 · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-465-4_13

In Vitro Glycosylation Assay for Bacterial Oligosaccharyltransferases

2013· article· en· W2426922068 on OpenAlexafffund
Matías A. Musumeci, M. Verónica Ielmini, Mario F. Feldman

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Glycomics CentreUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Heritage Foundation for Medical ResearchAlberta Glycomics Centre
KeywordsGlycoconjugateGlycosylationGlycanGlycosyltransferaseBiochemistryIn vitroEnzymeChemistryOligosaccharideAcceptorBiologyGlycoprotein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oligosaccharyltransferases (OTases) constitute a family of glycosyltransferases that catalyze the transfer of an oligosaccharide from a lipid donor to an acceptor molecule, commonly a protein. These enzymes can transfer a variety of glycan structures, including polysaccharides, to different protein acceptors. Therefore, this property endows the OTases with great biotechnological potential as these enzymes could be applied to produce several glycoconjugates relevant to the pharmaceutical industry. Furthermore, bacterial OTases are thought to be involved in pathogenesis mechanisms. Here we describe how to purify a representative OTase and its protein acceptor and glycan donor to perform in vitro glycosylation studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biology→Same topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research→French-language works237,207→