MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2427404475 · doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000000918

Kidney Paired Donation Protocol for Participating Donors 2014

2015· article· en· W2427404475 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robert Richardson, Maureen T. Connelly, Christine Dipchand, Amit X. Garg, Anand Ghanekar, Isabelle Houde, Olwyn Johnston, Rahul Mainra, Ruth McCarrell, Thomas Mueller, Peter Nickerson, Christine Pippy, Leroy Storsley, Kathryn Tinckam, Linda Wright, Serdar Yılmaz, David Landsberg

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Donation and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsGovernment of OntarioFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of AlbertaProvidence Health CareVancouver General HospitalNova Scotia Health AuthoritySaskatchewan Health AuthoritySaint John Regional HospitalHôtel-Dieu de QuébecHorizon Health NetworkLondon Health Sciences CentreDalhousie UniversityToronto General HospitalWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity Health NetworkVancouver Native Health SocietyCanadian Blood ServicesSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDonationMedicineKidney donationProtocol (science)TransplantationKidney transplantationFamily medicineSurgeryAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose of the Protocol This Protocol has been developed to ensure the harmonization of donor assessment and acceptance practices for enrolling living donors in the Kidney Paired Donation Program, managed and operated by Canadian Blood Services in collaboration with the provincial Living Kidney Donation and Transplant programs across the country. Assessment and acceptance criteria for living donors vary between programs across Canada as shown throughout this Protocol. This variability has two primary effects on the Kidney Paired Donation Program: declines of matched donors and delays in accepting a donor by the recipient’s program because of the need for additional testing to meet local assessment and acceptance criteria. Implementation of this protocol by participating Living Kidney Donation programs should help to minimize the problem of donors being declined when matched with a candidate in the Kidney Paired Donation Program. SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION Glossary of Acronyms and AbbreviationsTable: No title available.Background The Canadian Kidney Paired Donation Protocol for Participating Donors (hereafter called “the Protocol”) was prepared by a joint working group of the Canadian Blood Services' Living Donation Advisory Committee. Living kidney donation is an accepted, highly valued and effective practice to improve access to transplantation for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). For many patients it is the treatment of choice due to the scarcity of kidneys available through deceased donation and the superior outcomes in posttransplant renal function. Despite this success, it is paramount that the safety of the potential living donor is not overlooked in the desire to optimize living donor transplantation; and the potential living donor's offered kidney has been assessed in terms of its quality and the risk of transmitting disease to the recipient. “Safety is paramount to the success and sustainability of the Kidney Paired Donation Program.” With donor safety being paramount, it is essential that the Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) Program (formerly known as the Living Donor Paired Exchange Program [LDPE]) implement safeguards to inspire public and professional confidence in the quality of the program, and reduce complacency that may lead to compromised donor and transplant recipient outcomes. These safeguards will include the development of interprovincial policies, protocols, procedures, and guidelines for the ongoing management of the protocol and clinical practice related to potential living donors participating in the KPD Program. Ethical Principles By its nature, living donor transplantation has raised, and continues to raise, many ethical issues, especially where there may be pressures to consider potential living donors who may be considered by some to have “minor” risk factors. The challenge to expanding the acceptance criteria for potential living donors is the lack of evidence to suggest that expanded criteria are safe and unlikely to cause unanticipated health outcomes. To this end, principles were developed to guide the development of the Protocol as well as the policies, procedures, and clinical guidelines related to the administration of the KPD Program. The duty to proceed with a living donor nephrectomy only when it is undertaken with the potential living donor’s informed and freely given consent. ○ The potential living donor has the capacity to understand the likely risks and benefits of donation. ○ The potential living donor is provided with a detailed description of the risks and benefits of donation. ○ The potential living donor is able to demonstrate an understanding of the risks and benefits of donation. ○ The potential living donor is acting voluntarily and is under no coercion to donate. ○ Consent to becoming a living donor is an ongoing process. The duty to respect the autonomy of the potential living donor. ○ The choice to donate or not donate is respected. ○ The potential living donor has a right to change his or her mind about donation at any time. ○ Donor autonomy does not overrule medical judgment and decision-making. The duty to protect the potential living donor from anticipated harm as a direct result of donation. ○ It is the responsibility of the living donor evaluation team to establish and adhere to criteria for acceptance of a living donor based on current knowledge and practice. ○ To minimize an actual or perceived a conflict of interest, it is considered best practice to have a separation of roles between the donor medical team and the recipient medical team. ○ Minimization of potential living donor risk is the principle priority guiding all aspects of the evaluation and donation, including the timing of surgery. ○ The potential living donor will be given the opportunity and privacy to provide health care experts with a full report, to the best of his or her knowledge, of any and all health concerns, issues, and/or behaviours that might disqualify donation or cause health risks to the recipient. ○ It is the responsibility of the living donation team to follow up with the donor postsurgery. The duty to be transparent with respect to the knowledge of health risks associated with living donation. ○ Disclosure will include information about the risks associated with investigation procedures and surgery. The duty to ensure that the Kidney Paired Donation Protocol for Participating Donors reflects current knowledge. ○ Acceptable assessment criteria are established for the KPD Program and are reviewed periodically to ensure they are informed by evidence and acceptable medical practice. ○ Policies and procedures may require revision as new evidence, laws, and regulations come into being, or as program leads identify a need for additions, changes, and/or deletions. ○ Policies and procedures must be reviewed at least every 5 years, and sooner if indicated. ○ The Living Donation Advisory Committee is responsible for the review and revision of the policies and procedures. The duty to inform the potential living donor of previously undiagnosed health conditions, and to take acceptable action to refer the individual to the appropriate resources for intervention. ○ Continuation of the potential living donor’s workup will depend upon the health condition discovered and the potential donor’s willingness to complete any available and/or applicable treatment options. ○ Based on the discovery of an undiagnosed health condition, the living donor evaluation team may decide to discontinue the donor workup if donation could cause harm to the potential donor. Scope of the Protocol The Protocol has been developed by clinical experts based on current knowledge and practice with respect to the testing and acceptance criteria for a potential living kidney donor (hereafter called the The challenge to the Protocol was the lack of information with respect to potential donor outcomes based on risk factors. The Protocol on the of where evidence was not and where there was practice Canada and The need for additional testing does not all medical is as to the need for clinical based on a potential donor’s medical and and the from the it is that new knowledge will need to be considered where evidence or as to be considered appropriate risk for living kidney donation. The Living Donation Advisory Committee will consider new evidence when it of the Protocol. The Living Donation Advisory Committee reviewed current in a of evidence to the Protocol. It a of the living kidney donation as Canadian Blood Services and the Committee are the being undertaken by the Kidney The Living Donation Advisory Committee will review the by as they available and will to the Protocol where The Protocol was informed the Canada of and for available the Canada for and of and for available the Canadian and for available and the Canadian for available programs must with the health assessment regulations and as in the current of the guidelines were the for Living Donor Kidney available the and Donation by Living for Ethical for available and the and available and was from who the on the of Assessment and for Living Kidney Donors Participating in the Canadian Transplant Living Donor Paired Exchange Program. and were throughout the in the of with individual living kidney donor and renal transplant programs participating in the KPD Program. of the Protocol The Living Donation Advisory with the of Canadian Blood will a for the as well as for programs to living kidney donor and have The Kidney Paired Donation Protocol for Participating Donors was developed by the of the Canadian Blood Living Donation Advisory Committee. Blood Blood Living Canadian Blood Services Living Donation and Canadian Blood Services Donation and Canadian Blood Services SECTION The primary of the assessment of the potential donor’s health is to ensure the and of the potential donor. This an review of the potential donor’s medical and as well as an assessment of the potential donor’s to identify and medical The and in this Protocol are considered as the for Canadian practice when enrolling donors in the KPD Program. Living Kidney Donation programs are to or to with this Protocol. Assessment of Donors It is that there at a with the potential donor to the ongoing health and willingness to donate. To be with the Canada the and assessment of the potential donor’s health at the of the and be reviewed in the KPD Program, and of donation and include testing for at the of donation as or on on as the Canadian as current Canadian for the and of and of in the and Blood at group or and for and and with on the of renal and and the of the and and undertaken as Canadian guidelines on a in and for in on a and with and and to on and/or direct of and on by a health care to the Canadian Program of a and of the on the The are if a has been the and have been in and testing will result in are in of the To be considered in with the medical and the assessment the and the and risk for disease are may be in for the potential donor to donate under the in to of the Canada for Donation criteria as in the of the to will be into many factors. of Canadian the and being by Canadian Living Kidney Donation and by Canadian Living Kidney Donation programs when potential living kidney of Assessment and The Policies and the testing to the of Canadian programs are the are The of or evidence to a has to be managed by the potential donor’s on a all need assessment by an for and as current Canadian of a and of the on the living donor to an at or at the of a with a of to be assessed by an donors with no of donors with a to donors as a result of a undertaken the donors with a of who are considered to have a risk of of the by the team. for Donation donors with donors with a of that continues to be considered at risk of by the team. donors previously with of Canadian the by Canadian and by Canadian and Canadian on should be offered to all or with at least a there is a risk of the potential donor has a of or is of should be at or has been new that is every to should include and and are the No for all the in was may be in a to to to establish about of and are in The guidelines on suggest that they at years, and be every the is not a time. is information about no about of For to years, is not for to years, is every to clinical or in with and are not The Canadian of that is the of care in Canada for patients to or for should be offered to all and at if and are not for For of a and are of Assessment and of renal or with a of 5 to years, and 5 or in of the or is an to living kidney donation. of or be if of is with be if with between and are assessed on and with informed consent. Policies The potential donor's that or does not need kidneys to help and that or does not have a that be to recipient. testing is based on and for all for all or to for all for of or from a for all potential donors years, or based on for with a of in the and and on a of potential with transplantation renal and The and evaluation must with Canada and the in of this Protocol. of the and of the on the testing will be based on the from and the potential donor’s and for from a For with a for or a with the or is testing for all potential donors at risk of and donors to be for if between and and for donors who are and The potential donor has no or risk of that cause an risk or harm to the recipient. The potential donor has not been for and is from a The potential donor has for has been and is no at risk of transmitting based on the of an disease the a donor’s kidney may be considered for when the of the transplant is to the risk of disease These kidneys are under the Canada a potential donor with a for who has not an acceptable of treatment donation, or a potential donor who is or a potential donor with a risk for and a potential donor who is and for Donation potential donor or at the of or risk for or where the risk of disease is to the of the or under treatment that continues to be considered by disease or from an of or or The and provide a complete of for donation based on disease of Canadian the Canada for effective disease testing of or Canada for effective disease testing of or of Canada additional disease on potential donors by Canadian Living Kidney Donation disease on potential donors by Canadian Living Kidney Donation Canada at the of the in the donation, and on the of Canada has with to medical the potential donor about risk for and The potential donor should have a complete including not by transplant and is no in the current Canada in about the of the potential donor’s medical when there is a between the evaluation and the a under revision the information be Canada a at the to it should be the the of there is an in the the program will take responsibility for if a should be to the clinical condition of the potential donor. Donor or and With a of and of Assessment and and is no in the The suggest potential donor provide no criteria for acceptance of The have for to be to the potential and of in transplant of of donor and recipient of in transplant on disease in SECTION and for some potential donors may to a risk for and in or have a risk or of to in of and risk factors. be considered a to donation, it must be considered in of health as well as any additional to to the potential donor may be of Canadian Canadian programs a on potential donors and take into and for risk of of Canada of Assessment and and a of has not been considered as a risk it that a of disease in a under the of the potential donor into the the of disease be in a of the risk of available to at may be to and risk of are on the of nephrectomy in potential donors from who may be at risk of and potential of of of between and with a of or is associated with a risk of and donation is with a of are at risk of the disease risk the of is the of the risk of is risk is The of and an individual at risk of in of and are at risk of of and at risk of because of a and/or should an and should only be considered as potential donors if the result is For with a the risk of 5 is and is by and there is a of the risk of is and kidney donation is donors at risk of years, or or should be with a the ○ the potential donor is and this is an to living kidney donation. ○ to the potential donor has and this is an to living kidney donation. ○ is and not a to donation. of is an to living kidney donation. and and Living Kidney Donor as an essential of the potential donor that and donors are at risk of kidney disease and and that the evidence of risk is that the of all donors does not the the of and in and that the risk of or a risk of by to including and this that donors a of and a in and that may the of reviewed from to and that of living donors have medical that may be associated with health The suggest that the of donors may be in years, the of donor applicable to donors and the informed process. The that the risk of in donors who have in and a of has not been in a potential donor donor and recipient renal in is not a to living donation. is only of many risk that must be any potential donor be at the of they should be to the donation and should be provided with the resources to to is a risk for and of For potential donors with a of testing as a or should be on the of the medical and the or with no evidence of or or for Donation with or or of Canadian the assessment the of Canadian living donation programs about the of and the of of Canada are no from Canada related to in living the of Assessment and and The and the Kidney for with about not any about the acceptance of potential donors who are current of in is some evidence to suggest a between in and a risk of and kidney disease in living It is to have a and to on the of a on a with of are Living Kidney Donation programs the risks of living kidney donation in with a of or of in The from the evidence review of living donor assessment and acceptance will be an in this For with a of in a detailed description of the including the of of in and clinical and should be potential donor with a of in and who has renal no and no potential donor with a of who is who has a or a and who has renal no and no for Donation potential donor with a of in donor with a of in in potential donor with a of in and is of Canadian programs have that an is of Canada are no direct Canada of Assessment and and The and the an The Canadian for the and of and of in the are by the Canadian The by the as well as risk should be into a risk that the need for the potential donor to is not a to kidney donation, and a potential donor’s should not be considered in of risk factors. of Canadian all Canadian programs require and a programs a of and as well as of Canada are no Canada related to in living of Assessment and and the the the have for for potential and is by a of suggest the between and kidney disease and a in and all potential donors should have and potential donors should be the to the donor and to donation. and with no risk factors. for Donation when associated are of Canadian The of programs It is from the information provided program as a for in terms of for living donation. of Canada of Assessment and there is a lack of with respect to potential donors with a the practice programs is to potential donors with a and to consider the of risk accepting a potential donor with a and to potential donor if or is to ○ and renal ○ provide about the risk of from outcomes on the ○ provide risk of kidney and ○ provide on and of safety donation. policies No based on No based on and the on is associated with and is considered a to living donation because of the of the of on the of the of living donors no in and between and of a for patients from and at the was associated with an risk of to the were to the of on the of and the was not able to between and have been from a of an in in donors for and are and include and a of living donors a in the were was not associated with a in to a of was in only of was an of donor of patients with of of patients the of nephrectomy for clinical not with a of was associated with on to at of donation, a was associated with and a that was the Living Donor the of was associated with living donors with a might be at risk of a renal Donors with have a in No the additional risk in donors as with with donors with donors with the of and a of to no in renal and were between the two a of and quality of the and every it was that was of the that an capacity was and donation in was of the for renal of the evidence of was by and capacity was assessed by with and and donation with donor the of to was with in a renal that was not in Donor assessed donor renal donation. were available for of donors from donation, was to be associated with a in assessed the risk of renal and risk donation. patients 5 to were and matched with with two in donors with was to be to renal in donors with and renal in donor was renal in the donors and a of and no in the of and was between donors and The that donors are not at risk of renal with and that the risk of and was related to not on recipient outcomes The of from donors with was with the of who from donors with was and a of were in of from donors The were between and on of the to who a kidney between and a was associated with a were the clinical of this is of renal outcomes in living kidney is a disease that in It is in with a of the who are or with a of The risk of is in is or of and with are at risk of and a of is an to living donation. donors with risk for should be and considered as for donation if the of are acceptable to the current Canadian for the testing and of guidelines has or is For potential donors who have risk for or who or at the of health as by the of medical and the there is an or an to on at least the potential donor should have testing to the Canadian donors with a and donors with a between and or to on at least with at risk of with a or with a for Donation donors with a on or a of to the Canadian donors with a between and or of to on at least with potential donor with a of potential donor with a of potential donor with a of and a of the of the of Canadian The at Canadian programs was on two programs not they for and additional testing including and of Canada Canada the Canadian for the of Canada does not have any direct on this related to of Assessment and the potential donor about the of and of and and on testing for in the for at least potential donors must have between and an and an must be donors with an risk of because of a or should an the a and/or an the risk of the potential donor donation must be of patients with as potential donors evaluation of the risks and the of evidence of and that risk as or are be considered for kidney donation a assessment of the risk of and renal disease in the of a The testing if the potential donor is at risk of of or they an and including for and The that potential donors have a on at least on the potential donor is and this is an to living kidney donation. to on at least the should have a this is and not a to donation. patients at risk of years, or or should be with a the of the the is and this is an to living donation. to this has and this is an to living kidney donation. is and not a to living kidney donation. and for The available This of and to the risk of The risk assessment by the is as a in the This the of and risks for the development of and renal It has been clinical it does not include to a of clinical associated with an risk of and for Donation Living kidney donation is in a potential donor with The criteria for require the of any of the any two of the and or to or or or of Canadian The of programs and of programs of Canada are no Canada of Assessment and and Policies to risk of if risk are and The this as it to living kidney donors is an on the of it was that is the primary clinical of the the risk of is and is a risk for The not for the of the the available criteria provided a to identify patients at risk of The and the of are require if is and is of the criteria there was that and are the for treatment to reduce is no have been for the of risk in with patients where have to the risk the should be with to current the that and may be an additional on the of the donors with an at assessment should be to a of to the Canadian Program is a risk for renal the risk is and is by The of in the is all potential donors with especially who are the of years, may be potential donor with on a is in is on the outcomes and of disease of living donors who are with and who are or a potential donor’s may be by current by a or should not be considered as for living donation additional risk have been and the to For potential donors with an to to testing as to risk and to and potential donor. potential donor of or with on for the treatment of and with no additional or risk factors. for Donation potential donor on donor with potential donor with related to potential donor with on with and risk factors. potential donor with and who is of of Canadian programs on at least or is in of the programs for information was the criteria for the of were not program on all a Canadian review of living an variability in the acceptance of donors was some programs all potential program of the acceptance is of Canada are no from Canada about and donation. of Assessment and and are for the assessment of the of potential should be considered for potential donors who have or who are or if this is donor nephrectomy is not donors with should be considered as and for nephrectomy on the of donors with should be about the risk of and associated and the need for should be of assessment should be is not is The of to that is with to is not a to kidney donation, provided that has been of or that to are to donor Policies policies that be if it is to an guidelines that potential living kidney donors have on at least with a on all or are may be ○ with an or ○ with an on the is a to donation. and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.045
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.045
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1510.046

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicOrgan Donation and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207