MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2427492222 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.052009

Search for top squarks in final states with one isolated lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>collisions with the ATLAS detector

2016· article· lv· W2427492222 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Aaboud, G. Aad, B. Abbott, B Abeloos, H. Abramowicz, T. Agatonović-Jovin

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2016
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaAustralian Research CouncilJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Research Center "Kurchatov Institute"Fondation Partager le SavoirServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesBergens ForskningsstiftelseGeorgian National Science FoundationMinistarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog RazvojaVetenskapsrådetJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundEuropean Research CouncilCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMax-Planck-GesellschaftKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseIsrael Science FoundationMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiNarodowe Centrum NaukiCanada Foundation for InnovationConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftNational Research Council CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesAustrian Science FundEuropean CommissionLeverhulme TrustFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and DevelopmentMinisterstvo školstva, vedy, výskumu a športu Slovenskej republikyDanmarks GrundforskningsfondNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaStichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der MaterieScience and Technology Facilities CouncilMinisterstvo Průmyslu a ObchoduSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftChinese Academy of SciencesNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaAgence Nationale de la RechercheMinerva FoundationArizona-Nevada Academy of ScienceDepartment of Science and Technology, Republic of South AfricaGeneralitat ValencianaGeneralitat de CatalunyaArkansas Space Grant ConsortiumGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuResearch Grants Council, University Grants CommitteeCanarieSeventh Framework ProgrammePoultry Industry CouncilCERNNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaIsraeli Centers for Research ExcellenceU.S. Department of EnergyOntario Innovation TrustHelmholtz-GemeinschaftNorges ForskningsrådNatur og Univers, Det Frie ForskningsrådTRIUMFAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungEuropean Social FundCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueRoyal SocietyLundbeckfondenCompute CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGluinoParticle physicsPhysicsNeutralinoSupersymmetryNuclear physicsPair productionQuarkLeptonTop quarkLarge Hadron ColliderElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The results of a search for the top squark, the supersymmetric partner of the top quark, in final states with one isolated electron or muon, jets, and missing transverse momentum are reported. The search uses the 2015 LHC $pp$ collision data at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=13\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{TeV}$ recorded by the ATLAS detector and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $3.2\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{fb}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$. The analysis targets two types of signal models: gluino-mediated pair production of top squarks with a nearly mass-degenerate top squark and neutralino and direct pair production of top squarks, decaying to the top quark and the lightest neutralino. The experimental signature in both signal scenarios is similar to that of a top quark pair produced in association with large missing transverse momentum. No significant excess over the Standard Model background prediction is observed, and exclusion limits on gluino and top squark masses are set at 95% confidence level. The results extend the LHC run-1 exclusion limit on the gluino mass up to 1460 GeV in the gluino-mediated scenario in the high gluino and low top squark mass region and add an excluded top squark mass region from 745 to 780 GeV for the direct top squark model with a massless lightest neutralino. The results are also reinterpreted to set exclusion limits in a model of vectorlike top quarks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations82
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207