Synthesis and Solution Self‐Assembly of Polyisoprene‐<i>block</i>‐poly(ferrocenylmethylsilane): A Diblock Copolymer with an Atactic but Semicrystalline Core‐Forming Metalloblock
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polyisoprene‐block‐poly(ferrocenylmethylsilane) (PI‐b‐PFMS) copolymers, containing the atactic but semicrystalline PFMS block, have been prepared by sequential anionic polymerization of isoprene and methyl[1]silaferrocenophane. The reaction to form the metalloblock is not living in nature, but still enabled three block copolymers to be prepared (PI35‐b‐PFMS5, PI200‐b‐PFMS10, and PI247‐b‐PFMS23) with relative narrow molar mass distributions (polydispersity < 1.3). The self‐assembly of all three materials was studied in PI selective n‐alkanes and found to afford lenticular platelets, tapered cylindrical micelles, and regular cylinders, as the length of the PFMS block increased. PI200‐b‐PFMS10 micelles could be increased in length by self‐seeding a sample of short micelles at temperatures of 90 °C and above; however, this process also resulted in an increase in width. Addition of a solution of PI247‐b‐PFMS23 copolymer to preformed seed micelles also resulted in an increase in length, although growth is not linearly related to the amount of copolymer added beyond ≈600 nm. image
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".