MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2429085532 · doi:10.1385/0-89603-381-3:191

Isolation and Characterization of Porins from H. pylori

2003· article· en· W2429085532 on OpenAlexaff
Robert E. W. Hancock, Maurice M. Exner

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacterial outer membraneMembraneLipopolysaccharideChemistryOuter membrane efflux proteinsDivalentBiochemistryBacteriaGram-negative bacteriaGlycolipidMicrobiologyEscherichia coliBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria represent selective, permeability barriers to environmental molecules. This function is accomplished in two ways. First, outer membranes exclude many larger hydrophilic molecules, including enzymes and other proteins, and most hydrophobic ones, by virtue of their unique composition. It has been demonstrated in Escherichia coli that outer membranes are asymmetric bilayers containing a unique species of glycolipid, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), in its outer leaflet, and phospholipids in its inner leaflet. The highly negatively charged LPS is stabilized by divalent cations. The observations that Helicobacter outer membrane proteins are Triton X-100 insoluble in the absence of EDTA or NaCl (1,2), that Helicobacter contains substantial amounts of LPS 3, and that Helicobacter is resistant to highly hydrophobic antibiotics, such as trimethoprin and nalidixic acid (4), lead one to believe that this organism is thematically similar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207