Effects of Recycling on the Mechanical Behavior of Polypropylene at Room Temperature Through Statistical Analysis Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article reports the effects of recycled material percentage, annealing conditions, and glass fiber percentage on the mechanical behavior of injection molded polypropylene samples. Specimens were prepared with different percentages of recycled material ranging from 0 to 100%. Two groups of samples, i.e., non‐annealed and annealed at 150°C, were tested to investigate annealing effects. The effects of adding fiber (0–7.5%) to specimens was also investigated. It was found that increasing the amount of recycled material improves the material properties in a non‐linear trend. Annealing had a significant positive effect on both non‐fiber‐added and fiber‐added samples: it improved the yield stress of non‐reinforced polypropylene samples by more than 10% and their Young's modulus by about 50%. Fiber‐added materials showed more variability, and adding fiber also improved the Young's modulus and the yield stress of the samples by about 50%. The results indicate that the three factors investigated improved toughness of the injected polypropylene samples; however the effects are not significant. The study findings reveal that using recycled polypropylene has no significant effect on the material properties of polypropylene. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:1283–1290, 2016 © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".