In-Stent Stenosis Following Covered Stent-Graft Placement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Internal carotid artery (ICA) covered stent-grafts are increasingly utilized for the endovascular management of traumatic carotid pseudoaneurysms 1 " 9 , carotid-cavernous fistulas 1012 , large petrous/cavernous carotid aneurysms 12 and carotid blow-out syndrome 7 .Early covered stent grafts were selffabricated using polytetrafluoroethylene or autologous vein mounted onto bare metal stents.Pre-mounted balloon expandable or self-expanding stent-grafts are now commercially available.Covered stents provide an alternate treatment option for high surgical risk or inaccessible lesions or when observation and anticoagulation are less than desirable.Potential advantages of covered stent grafts include minimal invasiveness, shorter hospital stays, lower cost and less post-procedural pain.Caution in the application of this relatively new technology and careful follow-up are required, however, as is illustrated by two patients with internal carotid artery stenosis following covered stent-graft placement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".