MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W242994972

The Edmund-Fremund Scribe Copying Chaucer

2009· article· en· W242994972 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Simon Horobin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Early Book Society for the Study of Manuscripts and Printing History · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopyingClassicsHistoryLiteratureArtLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The was named by Kathleen Scott in an article describing his copying activities and particularly his specialism in the works of Lydgate. (1) To date all or part of a total of ten manuscripts have been attributed to the hand of this busy scribe, all containing works by Lydgate. Four are copies of the Lives of Saints Edmund and Fremund; two are copies of the Fall of Princes (one of these now only a fragment); two preserve the Secrees of Old Philisoffres, left unfinished by Lydgate at his death in 1449 and subsequently completed by his yonge folowere Benedict Burgh; another is a copy of the Troy Book. (2) Scholars disagree about the full extent of the scribe's contribution to British Library MS Harley 2255, an anthology of Lydgate's minor verse, although all concur that this scribe was responsible for copying at least part of that collection. (3) The only one of these manuscripts to contain work by another author is British Library MS Harley 4826 which adds Hoccleve's Regiment of Princes to the more predictable combination of the Lives of Saints Edmund and Fremund and the Secrees. This focus on the works of Lydgate, particularly on his lives of the East Anglian saints Edmund and Fremund, suggests that the scribe was based in the poet's home town of Bury St Edmunds, more likely in a commercial workshop than in a scriptorium based at the abbey itself. (4) Kathleen L. Scott's study of the pictorial cycle employed for the lavishly illustrated manuscripts of Edmund and Fremund concluded that the model was that devised for the presentation copy of this work, now British Library MS Harley 2278, a manuscript produced to commemorate Henry VI's visit to Bury in 1433/4 and subsequently presented to the king. (5) The scribe's apparent access to this manuscript, or at least its model, implies proximity to Bury and connections with the abbey, where it is presumed Harley 2278 was produced. The provenance of some of the manuscripts copied by the Edmund-Fremund scribe adds further support to their suggested Suffolk origin. British Library MS Harley 1766, containing the Fall of Princes, was owned in the sixteenth century by a Suffolk native, John Walker of Willisham, Suffolk. Harley 4826 was owned by the prominent Drury family who also owned the Ellesmere manuscript of Chaucer's Canterbury Tales and two copies, or a two-volume copy, of the Fall of Princes. (6) There is further evidence for co-ordination in the decoration and illustration of these manuscripts, which is the work of a small group of provincial artists and decorators. Scott has shown that the border artists employed a strikingly similar style to that of British Library MS Additional 11814, containing the Middle English translation of Claudian's De Consulatu Stilichonis attributed to Osbern Bokenham, produced at Clare Priory in Suffolk in 1445. (7) Only British Library MS Arundel 99 employs a different decorative style, which Scott attributes to a London workshop. As well as presenting deluxe illustrated copies of Lydgate's work, these manuscripts are also textually important, as several preserve variant or supplementary texts. Three of the copies of the Lives of Saints Edmund and Fremund contain additional stanzas describing miracles of St Edmund that took place in London and Bury in 1441 and 1444, though these are not generally thought to be by Lydgate. (8) The of the Fall of Princes attested by Harley 1766 and McGill 143 is an abbreviated of Lydgate's lengthy work, with the text compressed into eight rather than nine books and supplemented with some additional material. (9) In his edition of the Fall of Princes, Henry Bergen attributed this to a scribal redactor, arguing that, while the manuscript may have been made during Lydgate's lifetime, there is no evidence for his having seen it, or contributing to its reworking of the Fall. (10) A.S.G. Edwards, however, has argued that the intelligence with which the changes have been implemented raises the possibility that the abbreviated may be an early by Lydgate, or perhaps a later compact version made on demand for a specific patron. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Early Book Society for the Study of Manuscripts and Printing HistorySame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207