MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2430239354

Presse gaie, littérature et reconnaissance homosexuelle au tournant des années 1980 en France et au Québec

2016· article· fr· W2430239354 on OpenAlexaffabout
Luc Pinhas, Nicholas Giguère

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue critique de fixxion française contemporaine · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPersonaArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, les auteurs proposent une analyse de la place qu’a occupee au tournant des annees 1980 la litterature gaie dans la presse gaie francaise et quebecoise ( Gai Pied , Masques , Le Berdache ), ainsi que dans le catalogue de la maison d’edition Persona. Apres un portrait quantitatif du corpus, ils se penchent sur les sources proprement dites et montrent que la litterature renvoie a des preoccupations bien precises : revendication de l’homosexualite au sein de l’espace public, affirmation de modes de vie, construction d’une memoire, d’un passe historique et litteraire gai, interrogation sur la question pedophile. Leur contribution se conclut par une reflexion sur la notion meme de litterature gaie, fort problematique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0110.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue critique de fixxion française contemporaineSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207