New euophryine jumping spiders from the Dominican Republic and Puerto Rico (Araneae: Salticidae: Euophryinae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Twenty four new species and three new genera of euophryine jumping spiders from two Caribbean Islands, Hispaniolaand Puerto Rico, are described. The new genera are Corticattus (C. guajataca sp. nov. and the type species C. latus sp.nov.), Popcornella (P. furcata sp. nov., P. nigromaculata sp. nov., P. yunque sp. nov. and the type species P. spiniformissp. nov.) and Truncattus (T. cachotensis sp. nov., T. dominicanus sp. nov. and the type species T. flavus sp. nov.). The othernew species belong to the genera Agobardus (A. bahoruco sp. nov., A. cordiformis sp. nov., A. gramineus sp. nov., A.oviedo sp. nov., A. phylladiphilus sp. nov.), Anasaitis (A. adorabilis sp. nov., A. brunnea sp. nov., A. hebetata sp. nov., A.laxa sp. nov.), Antillattus (A. applanatus sp. nov.), Bythocrotus (B. crypticus sp. nov.) and Corythalia (C. broccai sp. nov.,C. bromelicola sp. nov., C. coronai sp. nov., C. peblique sp. nov.). Photographs of living spiders and diagnostic illustrations are provided for all of the new species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".