Sphingosine 1‐phosphate receptor 1 is required for retinal ganglion cell survival after optic nerve trauma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we used a classical optic nerve injury model to address the function of the sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)-S1P receptor (S1PR) axis in retinal ganglion cell (RGC) death and axonal growth. After lesion, the expression of S1PR1 was generally reduced in axotomized RGCs but persisted in αRGCs, a subpopulation of injury-resistant RGCs. Silencing S1PR1 with an adeno-associated virus serotype 2 (AAV2) containing a shRNA specific to S1PR1 (AAV2.shRNA-S1PR1) exacerbated the loss of RGCs induced by optic nerve crush; the rate of RGC survival was decreased by more than 24% in retinae infected with AAV2.shRNA-S1PR1 compared with AAV2.shRNA-scrambled or AAV2.GFP control treatments. In the superior and temporal regions of the retina, cell death rose by more than ~ 35% and ~ 50%, respectively, in comparison with control groups. In the optic nerve, S1PR1 silencing markedly reduced axonal sprouting after the lesion relative to control animals. Early after optic nerve crush, 67% of αRGCs stained for osteopontin were lost in retinae infected with AAV2.shRNA-S1PR1, whereas the number of intrinsically photosensitive RGCs expressing melanopsin, another injury-resistant RGC type, was not affected. Moreover, retinal infection with AAV2.shRNA-S1PR1 down-regulated mammalian target of rapamycin pathway activation in αRGCs. Together, our results reveal that S1PR1 contributes to survival and growth mechanisms in injured RGCs by regulating the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. The role of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1) was studied in retinal ganglion cell survival and axonal growth after optic nerve injury. After axonal damage, S1PR1 expression was decreased in retinal neurons. Viral-mediated S1PR1 down-regulation enhanced injury-induced cell death and reduced spontaneous axonal growth. In injury-resistant retinal neurons, the activation of mTOR signalling was down-regulated by silencing S1PR1, suggesting an important role for S1PR1 in neuronal growth and survival mechanisms in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".