MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2431866549 · doi:10.5569/1134-7147.61.02

Regulación del diagnóstico social en el País Vasco: intenciones, resultados y vericuetos

2016· article· es· W2431866549 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZERBITZUAN · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Law and Work Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWSP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artikulu honek gizarte-diagnostikoaren gaineko \nhausnarketa pertsonala azaltzen du, Eusko \nJaurlaritzak 353/2013 Dekretuaren bidez ezarritako \neredua, hain zuzen. Eredu horren aurrekariak eta \nezaugarriak labur finkatu ondoren, egileak bere \nburuari galdetzen dio erabilera eskasari eta horren \nondorioei buruz. Idazkiaren bukaeran, planteatzen \nditu ereduaren objektibotasun/subjektibotasunen \narteko eztabaidak, jasotako kritikak —gehienetan, \neredua aldez aurretik erabili gabe egindakoak— eta \nbaliabidearen etorkizuna

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it