MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2431932294 · doi:10.1127/anthranz/61/2003/245

The need of specific standards for head dimensions of urban Sardinian boys

2003· article· en· W2431932294 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emanuele Sanna, Lucia Palmas, Nicola Tedesco, Giovanni Floris

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologischer Anzeiger · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Conflict Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHead circumferenceCircumferenceHead (geology)DemographyEthnic groupGeographyHead startPsychologySociologyMathematicsDevelopmental psychologyBirth weightAnthropologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the 1997-1998 and 1998-1999 school years we measured head dimensions of 1600 boys from 6 to 13 years attending elementary and middle schools in towns of the Cagliari area (Sardinia, Italy). For each age, we compared the mean values for circumference, length and width of the head with Canadian standards, widely used by Sardinian pediatricians. The t-test shows that the means of the three variables are significantly lower in the Cagliari boys than in their Canadian contemporaries, with the exception of head circumference in 6 and 7 year-olds, and of head width in 10 year-olds. Therefore, it is necessary to produce specific growth charts for circumference, length and width of the head of Sardinian children rather than evaluate their growth using standards of populations with different ethnic, geographical and socio-economic backgrounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologischer AnzeigerSame topicHealth and Conflict StudiesFrench-language works237,207