Bibliographic record
Abstract
A key operation in network analysis is the discovery of cohesive subgraphs. The notion of $k$-truss has gained considerable popularity in this regard, based on its rich structure and efficient computability. However, many complex networks such as social, biological and communication networks feature uncertainty, best modeled using probabilities. Unfortunately the problem of discovering k-trusses in probabilistic graphs has received little attention to date. In this paper, given a probabilistic graph G, number k and parameter γ --(0,1], we define a (k,γ)-truss as a maximal connected subgraph H ⊆ G, in which for each edge, the probability that it is contained in at least (k-2) triangles is at least γ. We develop an efficient dynamic programming algorithm for decomposing a probabilistic graph into such maximal (k,γ)-trusses. The above definition of a (k,γ)-truss is local in that the "witness" graphs that has the (k-2) triangles containing an edge in H may be quite different for distinct edges. Hence, we also propose: a global (k,γ)-truss, which in addition to being a local (k,γ)-truss, has to satisfy the condition that the probability that H contains a k-truss is at least γ. We show that unlike local (k,γ)-trusses, the global (k,γ)-truss decomposition on a probabilistic graph is intractable. We propose a novel sampling technique which enables approximate discovery of global (k,γ)-trusses with high probability. Our extensive experiments on real datasets demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed approach and the usefulness of local and global (k,γ)-truss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".