MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rapid Pharmacotherapeutic Intervention for an Influenza a Outbreak in the Canadian Arctic: Lessons from the Sanikiluaq Experience

2001· article· en· W2432479517 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul Van Caeseele, Alexander Macaulay, Pamela Orr, F. Y. Aoki, B. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Circumpolar Health · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircumpolar starIntervention (counseling)OutbreakMedicineZanamivirNeuraminidase inhibitorPandemicNursingFamily medicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)VirologyDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In January of 2000 an outbreak of influenza-like illness (ILI) was identified by Health Centre nursing staff in the remote island Inuit community of Sanikiluaq, Nunavut. A staged approach to an intervention strategy was adopted and an intervention team dispatched within 48 hours with diagnostic, prophylactic, and therapeutic capabilities and the intent to evaluate the response as well. The presence of influenza virus was determined on site in 3 out of thirteen initial cases of ILI using portable kit based rapid detection. This permitted the use of zanamivir (an inhaled neuraminidase inhibitor) for prophylaxis in 201, and for treatment in 12 persons. Amantadine was only used in 16 and 52 were ineligible for medical intervention, mostly because they fell outside of the window of opportunity or for maternal/reproductive reasons. The intervention strategy framework adopted was felt to be successful and is presented for consideration in future intervention initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.240
GPT teacher head0.512
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Circumpolar HealthSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207