MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2432749080 · doi:10.1055/s-2001-13694

A Case of Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome Involving the Entire Gastrointestinal Tract

2001· article· en· W2432749080 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. Junk, W. Zegarski, Petra Bilinski

Bibliographic record

VenueEndoscopy · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGastroenterologyDiarrheaInternal medicineDuodenumProtein losing enteropathyEnteropathyStomachJejunumPrednisoloneLamina propriaPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We encountered a case of a 56-year-old woman with Cronkhite-Canada syndrome who presented with chronic diarrhea, alopecia, intermittent abdominal pain, hyperpigmentation, and nail dystrophy (Figure [1]). Her face, palms, and the back of her hands and soles of her feet were deeply pigmented with small dark brown spots. Her family history was noncontributory. Serum total protein was 5.4 g/dl, with 2.4 g/dl of albumin. Endoscopic examination of the stomach showed multiple sessile polyps, varying in size from 2 mm to 10 mm throughout the entire stomach and duodenum (Figure [2]). Small-bowel x-ray and colonoscopic examination revealed multiple polyps from the jejunum to the rectum. Histopathologic examination of these polyps revealed edema of the lamina propria, and mucosal erosion associated with evidence of chronic inflammation. Scintigraphy with technetium-99m-labeled human albumin demonstrated a protein-losing enteropathy. Hyperalimentation (2200kcal/d) was continued for 8 weeks. At 1 week later, the patient's diarrhea showed a decrease in severity, with improvement in appetite and weight gain. However, the diarrhea recurred after 2 weeks. After administration of prednisolone, 30 mg daily, and trimethoprim with sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim), clinical improvement was noted, with cessation of diarrhea, increased serum protein, disappearance of pigmentation, and regrowth of the scalp hair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndoscopySame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207