MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2433082280

HOTMAN, François, Antitriboniano (edición bilingüe). Estudio preliminar de M. Martínez Neira. Traducción de A. Mora Cañada, Madrid, Instituto Figuerola (Universidad Carlos III)-Dykinson, 2013, 211 pp. ISBN 978-84-9301-664-1

2014· article· es· W2433082280 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rafael Ramis Barceló

Bibliographic record

VenueAnuario de Historia del Derecho Español · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Studies and Legal History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hay obras que son mucho mas mentadas que leidas. Es lo que ocurre con el Antitriboniano de Francois Hotman (1524-1590), un autor cuya obra fue reimpresa y citada con profusion durante los siglos xvii y xviii. Conoce ahora una cuidadosa edicion bilingue (frances-espanol) debida a la profesora Adela Mora Canada, catedratica jubilada de la Universidad Carlos III, traductora experimentada y buena conocedora de la historia del derecho moderno.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnuario de Historia del Derecho EspañolSame topicClassical Studies and Legal HistoryFrench-language works237,207